Meet the Experts: Eric
Wisotzky
Gary: For our
next feature, we are highlighting Eric Wisotzky, a rising star in the world of
PM&R. Eric is a national leader in the emerging field of Cancer
Rehabilitation, and has an interesting background that includes time in the
military, and leadership work in education.
Eric and I met one another
through the world of resident education. For several years, I ran the
Resident and Fellow Workshop at the annual meeting for the Association of
Academic Physiatrists. My co-coordinator Chris Visco was Eric's residency
mentor, and Chris praised Eric so highly that Eric became the first resident to
serve as a teacher at the workshop. Several years later, when Chris and I
were planning our succession, Eric was a clear choice to take over the
workshop, which he now leads along with James Wyss.
Let's start there by way of
introduction. Eric, can you tell us about your love of resident and
fellow education?
Eric: I
personally felt that many of my educational experiences, especially as a
medical student, left a lot to be desired.
As a medical student, I clearly recall times when I said to myself, “It
will be my mission to ensure that future students have a better educational experience
than mine.” In that regard, I try to
make the educational experiences of my medical students and residents as
academic and as fun as possible. I
personally believe that the academic factor and fun factor are equally
important and will lead to the most effective learning environment.
Gary:
Interesting. I think that rings true- much of my motivation to become a
teacher was, like yours, rooted in less than satisfying experiences as a
student. Similarly, I find that many of
my motivations as a physician are rooted in less than satisfying experiences as
a patient.
How do you feel your love of
resident and fellow education carries over into your interactions with
patients?
Eric: I feel that the teaching environment that I
work in greatly enhances my patient care.
My patients generally enjoy interacting with my residents. I’m surprised at the number of times patients
disappointedly ask me on follow-up visits, “Where is your resident?” if I do
not have one with me that day. I learn a
ton from my residents. They learn from
other doctors that may use different approaches and my residents will often
say, “Dr so-and-so likes to do this in this situation.” I consider myself fairly open minded. I don’t mind when the resident brings up
other suggestions and I often learn new approaches this way. I strongly believe that as supervising
physicians, we need to remember that we are not necessarily smarter than our
med students and residents, we are simply more experienced. I feel that not utilizing the brainpower that
a student or resident brings to the table is a lost opportunity for patient
care.
Gary: Seguing
into communication, one of my favorite things about you is how good it feels to
talk to you. I've noticed a few strengths in your communication style-
you project warmth, but you also clearly reflect with detail that makes it
apparent that you've heard the content of my message. Two questions for
you. First, is that consistent with how you view yourself as a
communicator, and second, is that something that comes natural to you, or is
that something you've cultivated over time?
Eric: Yes, I do
view myself as a good communicator. It
is something I pride myself upon. I get
such great pleasure out of seeing the understanding on a patient’s face when I
explain their medical condition to them.
It is really gratifying when a patient says, “Oh, I never understood
what was going on with my body until now.”
I never really understood why some
doctors have such a difficult time not speaking medical jargon to
patients. The way I always think of it
is that non-medical speak was my first language. I learned “medical language” later in
life. Therefore, I still think it’s a
lot easier for me to explain a patient’s medical condition in laymen’s terms,
because the laymen’s terms are my “first language”.
I would like to think that I
am very attuned to my strengths and weaknesses.
I am very self critical so I feel very aware of what I need to improve
upon. I know communication is a strength
of mine. I cannot say that I have
cultivated it, for whatever reason it has come naturally to me.
Gary: Can you
talk more about your military background, and how that has shaped the way you
view medicine and communication?
Eric:
I was in the United
States Navy for 5 years, 3 of which I served as a flight surgeon. This essentially means that I was the primary
care physician for a group of military aviators. I took care of a C-130 squadron and had the
opportunity to travel the world with them.
My military experience was the most important contributor to my
professional development. Before I
worked in the military, my professionalism needed a lot of work. I learned great leadership skills in the
Navy. My experience in the military
makes it harder for me to deal with the managed care system now, because in the
military you generally can do whatever you feel is the right treatment for that
patient.
Gary: Another
thing I've admired about you is your willingness to invest yourself in a career
that most people do not know much about. Can you explain what cancer
rehabilitation is?
Eric: Cancer and
cancer treatments can really wipe people out.
A huge percentage of cancer patients are healthy and feel good when they
are diagnosed with cancer. It’s not
until after they are treated that they become fatigued, deconditioned, and have
pain and balance problems, amongst other issues. Rehabilitation is a standard part of
treatment for people who have strokes or brain injuries. However, historically we have not
rehabilitated cancer patients despite major changes in their functional status
after cancer treatment. Cancer
rehabilitation aims to bring patients back to their baseline function after
battling cancer.
Gary: I am sure
a common question you hear is "why do I need a cancer PM&R physician,
when I already have an oncologist?" Shed some light.
Eric: In my
mind, this question is like asking, “why do I need a hairdresser when I already
have a plumber?” The skill sets and
training of an oncologist and a PM&R physician are very different. Oncologists are fantastic at treating
cancer. We know this because patients
with cancer are living longer and longer.
In the system I work in, the oncologists love working with me, because I
help the oncologists do what they do best – treat cancer. Rather than the oncologists having to spend
tons of time trying to manage all the functional side effects of treatment,
they can put those issues in my hands.
While most oncologists get some training and experience in managing
functional side effects, in general they are not very good at it. I’m not putting them down in any way, it is
just not what they are trained to do.
The oncologists I work closely with agree with this point. That’s why they love sending patients to me. They can spend more time with the patient
talking about cancer. I can spend lots of
time with the patient talking about their function. The patients go back to the oncologist and
thank them for referring them to me.
Everyone is happy.
Gary: That's such an important message. Can you
talk a bit more about the role of exercise for patients with cancer?
Eric: Exercise
is a booming area in cancer care. The
body of evidence that demonstrates that exercise can decrease the risk of
cancer recurrence is overwhelming at this point. Studies have shown that exercise can reduce
the risk of cancer recurrence just as well as hormone medications such as
tamoxifen. Many experts believe that in
the future, all cancer treatment protocols will include exercise, such as:
“surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, exercise”.
At this point, any oncologist who is not recommending exercise for their
cancer patient, unless there is an obvious contraindication, is doing their
patient a major disservice.
Gary: In
particular, can you talk more about risk of fractures in cancer patients?
I find that many oncologists are so concerned about patients falling and
breaking a bone, that they discourage their patients from exercise out of a
sense of fear.
Eric: Most cancer
patients are not at high risk for fracture.
If cancer has spread to bone, there is a potential risk for
fracture. Scales exist that can help
predict the risk for fracture. If the
risk truly is high, often surgery will be recommended to fix the bone before it
fractures. This is because it is safer
and easier to fix a bone before it fractures than after it fractures. For patients with cancer in their bones who
are not at high risk for fracture, exercise should be encouraged. Pain is a great guide. If a certain exercise causes pain in the area
of bony cancer, that exercise should be avoided. If it does not cause pain, the patient can
keep going! One important additional
factor to consider is the patient’s balance.
Chemotherapy can affect nerves, which can impact balance. If a patient’s balance is considerably
affected, then they may be at higher risk of falls and fractures. This is something that a PM&R specialist
can assess and help manage.
Gary: Even
amongst the small world of cancer PM&R specialists, you are even more
specialized in your usage of ultrasound as a tool to help patients. Can
you tell us more about how ultrasound helps you with your patients?
Eric: In
general, my use of ultrasound is no different than any other musculoskeletalmedicine physician. It is common for me
to see breast cancer patients with rotator cuff tendon problems. Ultrasound is so useful to characterize these
problems in the office. It is certainly
useful to help in performing accurate injections.
More specifically to the
cancer population, I have started performing some less commonly performed nerve
injections using ultrasound. For
example, it is very common for breast cancer patients to have pain in the
armpit area after lymph nodes are removed.
I never really understood why until I learned my surgical anatomy. There is a nerve in that area called the
intercostobrachial nerve that causes this pain.
I studied the anesthesia literature which helped me learn how to perform
an ultrasound-guided injection to block pain from this nerve. This technique has been very helpful for my
patients.
Another example is in head
and neck cancer patients (who badly need rehabilitation). There is a nerve in the neck that can be
affected by surgery and radiation called the greater auricular nerve. If injured, it can cause severe ear
pain. When I first started seeing these
patients with ear pain, I did not know how to explain it. However, after studying my anatomy, I
realized this nerve was the culprit. I
learned how ultrasound can help me inject around this nerve to decrease
pain. So, while I clearly do not need
ultrasound to help all of my patients, it can be a very helpful tool for
certain patients.
Gary: The more
I talk to you, it makes me wish we were in the same region. So many
patients would benefit from your care! For physicians like my partner
Garrett and I, what we can we do to help our patients who have cancer? In particular, I have some patients who I
have already been seeing for other conditions, who then develop cancer. How can I best be their advocate?
Eric:
It is important to think about the pre-existing musculoskeletal,
neuromuscular, and functional issues that your patient already has and how they
may be affected by cancer. If your
patient has shoulder issues, they most likely will worsen after a breast cancer
diagnosis without rehabilitation. If your
patient has a nerve issue, this most likely will worsen if your patient is
treated with chemotherapy. If your
patient has difficulty walking, this can worsen after cancer treatments. The good cancer rehab doctor will try to preempt
functional loss that can occur during the trials and tribulations of cancer
treatment.
The basic
principles of what a cancer PM&R physician does are minimally different
from what most PM&R physicians do.
In general, most physiatrists can take great care of these
patients. However, I do believe there
are some subtleties to caring for cancer patients. The first thing that really helps is having a
decent understanding of cancer treatments.
You don’t have to be an oncologist, but having a basic understanding of
the treatments helps me understand what has happened to my patient’s bodies and
how their function has been affected.
Secondly, I think there are few little tricks I know that seem to work
well for cancer patients. I believe
going to a cancer rehabilitation symposium like Sloan-Kettering’s annual
symposium is a great way to learn some of these tricks. Also, we should be pushing our national
leaders to include cancer rehabilitation lectures at our national meetings.
Gary: Eric,
thanks again for this interview. I sincerely feel that you are one of
those people who always brings something positive to the table, and never
leaves anything negative. Thanks for making the world a better place
No comments:
Post a Comment